Water hardness by zip code: how hard is the well water where you live?
Measured groundwater hardness for every US county we have data for — 434,761 samples from 214,292 wells, on an interactive map you can search by zip code.
Last updated · Source: USGS well samples via the Water Quality Portal
The short answer
Enter your zip code to see how hard the groundwater is in your county, measured from USGS well samples. Water above 7 grains per gallon (120 mg/L) is hard; above 10.5 gpg (180 mg/L) is very hard. On city water? Your utility’s annual water quality report lists its hardness.
Well water hardness map, county by county
Each county is shaded by the median of its USGS well samples. Hover or tap a county for its figure; tap once to zoom to its state. Hatched counties have fewer than five samples, so read them as a hint rather than an answer. Switch to “Since 1990” to see only the more recent samples.
- Soft to slightly hard under 3.5 gpg
- Moderately hard 3.5–7 gpg
- Hard 7–10.5 gpg
- Very hard 10.5–20 gpg
- Very hard over 20 gpg
- Hatched: fewer than 5 samples
- No data
What your number means
Hardness is dissolved calcium and magnesium, reported as the equivalent amount of calcium carbonate. Labs give it in mg/L (the same as ppm); softeners are sized in grains per gallon. One grain per gallon is 17.1 mg/L. The bands below are the USGS scale that our hardness converter also uses, and they describe how water behaves, not whether it is safe. The EPA sets no health limit for hardness.
| Class | gpg | mg/L | US counties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soft to slightly hard | 0–3.5 | 0–60 | 464 |
| Moderately hard | 3.5–7 | 60–120 | 396 |
| Hard | 7–10.5 | 120–180 | 382 |
| Very hard | 10.5+ | 180+ | 1,326 |
County counts are for the 2,568 counties with at least 5 samples. Hard water is the norm for wells, not the exception: 67% of those counties have a median above 7 gpg, and the typical US well in this data measures 11.1 gpg (190 mg/L).396 counties are above 20 gpg, which the map shows in its darkest shade. Below about 3.5 gpg a softener is hard to justify; above 7 gpg it starts to pay back through less scale and less soap.
Hardest and softest well water in America
The ten counties with the highest and lowest median, among counties with at least 20 samples from 10 or more different wells. Each well counts once, so one heavily sampled well cannot set a county’s figure.
Hardest 10 counties
| # | County | gpg | mg/L | Wells | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | King County, TX | 105.3 | 1,800 | 15 | 1978–1979 |
| 2 | Greer County, OK | 93.6 | 1,600 | 17 | 1950–1987 |
| 3 | Bent County, CO | 87.7 | 1,500 | 49 | 1964–2018 |
| 4 | Jackson County, OK | 80.7 | 1,380 | 35 | 1947–1989 |
| 5 | Prowers County, CO | 76.0 | 1,300 | 100 | 1958–2010 |
| 6 | Osceola County, IA | 76.0 | 1,300 | 29 | 1934–2004 |
| 7 | Brule County, SD | 70.2 | 1,200 | 39 | 1938–1981 |
| 8 | Otero County, CO | 58.5 | 1,000 | 88 | 1964–2018 |
| 9 | Chaves County, NM | 57.3 | 980 | 205 | 1926–2020 |
| 10 | Hudspeth County, TX | 57.2 | 977 | 22 | 1974–1992 |
Most of the hardest counties are in the southern Great Plains and the arid Southwest, where aquifers in gypsum-bearing rock add calcium sulfate to the usual carbonate. These are extreme figures from relatively few wells, and some rest on a single study: check the wells and years columns before quoting one.
Softest 10 counties
| # | County | gpg | mg/L | Wells | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aiken County, SC | 0.2 | 4 | 85 | 1945–2013 |
| 2 | Rankin County, MS | 0.2 | 4 | 60 | 1952–2018 |
| 3 | Humphreys County, MS | 0.2 | 4 | 24 | 1954–2019 |
| 4 | Hinds County, MS | 0.2 | 4 | 100 | 1944–2014 |
| 5 | Isle of Wight County, VA | 0.2 | 4 | 33 | 1969–2022 |
| 6 | Richmond County, GA | 0.3 | 4 | 45 | 1946–2023 |
| 7 | Taylor County, GA | 0.3 | 5 | 13 | 1958–2023 |
| 8 | Hoke County, NC | 0.3 | 5 | 10 | 1951–1963 |
| 9 | Putnam County, FL | 0.3 | 5 | 29 | 1980–2002 |
| 10 | Houston County, GA | 0.3 | 5 | 17 | 1948–2013 |
The softest well water is in the Southeast — Mississippi, Georgia, the Carolinas, Virginia and parts of Florida — where many wells draw from sandy coastal plain aquifers with little limestone for the water to dissolve.
Every state
Median of all wells sampled in the state, the share of its counties (with 5+ samples) whose median is hard, and the hardest county with at least 10 samples. Sort by any column. South Dakota has the hardest well water by state median (29.2 gpg), followed by Iowa (21.6 gpg); Mississippi has the softest (1.1 gpg). District of Columbia has too few samples for a state figure.
| Hardest county | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 2.0 | 15%of 59 | Lawrence County 10.2 | 7,554 |
| Alaska | 7.3 | 53%of 19 | Denali Borough 17.0 | 3,188 |
| Arizona | 12.3 | 100%of 15 | Yuma County 33.3 | 20,744 |
| Arkansas | 8.2 | 60%of 72 | Chicot County 23.8 | 4,618 |
| California | 11.4 | 63%of 56 | San Luis Obispo County 38.1 | 52,495 |
| Colorado | 13.5 | 80%of 59 | Bent County 87.7 | 10,338 |
| Connecticut | 4.2 | 0%of 8 | New Haven County 5.3 | 2,253 |
| Delaware | 2.9 | 0%of 3 | New Castle County 4.5 | 1,454 |
| District of Columbia | Insufficient data (1 of 1 counties with 5+ samples) | 86 | ||
| Florida | 14.6 | 83%of 60 | Manatee County 32.2 | 20,230 |
| Georgia | 5.7 | 24%of 111 | Glynn County 12.9 | 6,591 |
| Hawaii | 4.6 | 0%of 4 | Maui County 5.8 | 377 |
| Idaho | 9.9 | 61%of 44 | Caribou County 22.8 | 13,304 |
| Illinois | 19.4 | 98%of 55 | Fulton County 48.9 | 3,386 |
| Indiana | 17.0 | 100%of 54 | Adams County 40.9 | 5,172 |
| Iowa | 21.6 | 100%of 99 | Osceola County 76.0 | 14,367 |
| Kansas | 17.0 | 100%of 105 | Marion County 33.3 | 21,847 |
| Kentucky | 10.5 | 72%of 108 | Taylor County 33.3 | 4,225 |
| Louisiana | 3.1 | 48%of 63 | Lafourche Parish 56.1 | 21,519 |
| Maine | 2.7 | 7%of 14 | Aroostook County 8.0 | 1,078 |
| Maryland | 3.2 | 17%of 24 | Washington County 15.2 | 5,772 |
| Massachusetts | 2.3 | 8%of 13 | Berkshire County 8.0 | 3,537 |
| Michigan | 16.4 | 89%of 66 | Bay County 36.8 | 3,020 |
| Minnesota | 16.7 | 97%of 85 | Lincoln County 56.1 | 4,263 |
| Mississippi | 1.1 | 5%of 82 | Sharkey County 20.5 | 5,074 |
| Missouri | 15.2 | 97%of 108 | Mercer County 46.8 | 4,608 |
| Montana | 12.7 | 80%of 54 | Pondera County 48.5 | 6,614 |
| Nebraska | 13.5 | 89%of 88 | Boyd County 42.4 | 7,059 |
| Nevada | 7.9 | 59%of 17 | Clark County 18.0 | 4,259 |
| New Hampshire | 3.2 | 0%of 10 | Coos County 4.3 | 1,923 |
| New Jersey | 3.0 | 48%of 21 | Union County 12.5 | 6,770 |
| New Mexico | 14.6 | 83%of 30 | Chaves County 57.3 | 10,767 |
| New York | 4.6 | 70%of 59 | Niagara County 54.1 | 32,076 |
| North Carolina | 6.3 | 31%of 62 | Carteret County 15.8 | 5,739 |
| North Dakota | 17.0 | 85%of 53 | Grand Forks County 37.4 | 13,397 |
| Ohio | 20.8 | 96%of 46 | Allen County 39.3 | 3,148 |
| Oklahoma | 14.6 | 93%of 60 | Greer County 93.6 | 5,038 |
| Oregon | 5.0 | 23%of 26 | Benton County 13.5 | 1,598 |
| Pennsylvania | 7.0 | 55%of 67 | Cumberland County 16.1 | 11,107 |
| Rhode Island | 1.9 | 0%of 3 | Providence County 2.6 | 169 |
| South Carolina | 1.2 | 10%of 39 | Edgefield County 12.9 | 2,410 |
| South Dakota | 29.2 | 91%of 66 | Brule County 70.2 | 27,612 |
| Tennessee | 6.0 | 60%of 60 | Marshall County 17.7 | 3,413 |
| Texas | 12.7 | 69%of 135 | Stonewall County 105.3 | 13,219 |
| Utah | 15.9 | 100%of 28 | Emery County 28.7 | 10,730 |
| Vermont | 6.1 | 43%of 7 | Rutland County 7.6 | 112 |
| Virginia | 4.1 | 34%of 62 | Clarke County 20.2 | 2,848 |
| Washington | 4.8 | 42%of 38 | Franklin County 11.7 | 8,192 |
| West Virginia | 5.3 | 36%of 55 | Jefferson County 18.6 | 3,206 |
| Wisconsin | 14.0 | 74%of 72 | Milwaukee County 21.6 | 7,787 |
| Wyoming | 12.3 | 91%of 23 | Hot Springs County 32.4 | 4,468 |
Does drilling deeper get you softer water?
Across the country, deeper wells tend to be softer: wells under 100 feet have a median of 14.0 gpg, wells deeper than 600 feet 6.7 gpg. The pattern is not just a regional mix — in 408 of the 603 counties with at least 10 shallow (under 100 ft) and 10 deep (300 ft+) wells, the shallow wells are harder, and the typical deep-to-shallow ratio is 0.72.
That is a tendency, not a rule: in 190 of those counties the deep wells are harder. Whether a deeper well would be softer for you depends on which aquifer it reaches, and a well driller who knows the local formations is the person to ask.
City water is a different number
Everything on this page is groundwater from wells. If you are on a public supply, your water may come from a river or reservoir, may be blended from several sources, and may be softened at the treatment plant — so the county figure here can be far off.
Utilities publish hardness in their annual Consumer Confidence Report. Search for yours on EPA’s Consumer Confidence Report page, or call the number on your water bill. Private wells have no such report, which is the gap this dataset is meant to fill.
What to do with your county's number
A county median tells you what to expect, not what you have. Neighbouring wells can differ by several times, because depth, aquifer and local rock all change over short distances. Use the lookup to decide whether hardness is likely to be a problem, then measure your own well.
- Home test strips or a titration kit are accurate enough for hardness, cost little, and let you retest after any treatment is installed.
- A lab test is worth it if you are buying equipment anyway: iron and manganese change softener sizing, and a well should be tested for bacteria and nitrate regardless. See what a well water test costs.
- Got a result? The water test interpreter reads the whole report, and the softener sizing calculator turns hardness and iron into a grain capacity. Budget with what a softener costs.
Methodology and limits
Source. Groundwater samples collected by the U.S. Geological Survey and published through the Water Quality Portal (USGS, EPA and the National Water Quality Monitoring Council): characteristic “Hardness, Ca, Mg” (USGS parameter 00900) at sites typed as wells, for all 50 states and DC, downloaded September 25, 2026. The county comes from each well’s station record. Zip codes are matched to counties with the Census Bureau’s 2020 ZCTA-to-county relationship file: each zip goes to the county covering most of its land, and any other county covering at least 20% is shown too (4,236 of 33,791 zips).
Filters. Of 453,907 records we kept 434,761. We dropped 936 with no usable number (non-detects, blanks), 9,928 above 2,000 mg/L (brines and mine water rather than drinking-water wells), 2,525 exact duplicates, and 5,757 from wells whose names identify them as landfill or contamination monitoring wells or piezometers. Every kept record was reported in mg/L as CaCO₃, so no unit conversion was needed. Hardness can also be calculated from separate calcium and magnesium results; we did not do that, so a county where only those were measured shows less data here than exists.
Why medians, and why per well. Each well’s samples are reduced to that well’s median first; the county median, quartiles and “hard” share are then taken across wells. Medians are not dragged about by the occasional extreme sample, and one-well-one-vote stops a single monitoring well sampled dozens of times from outvoting the rest of a county. The “harder than X% of counties” rank compares against the 2,568 counties with at least 5 samples.
Age. Samples run from 1889 to 2023; half were taken before 1977, and only 26% since 1990. Aquifer chemistry changes slowly, so old samples are still informative, but the “Since 1990” map view is there if you want to check. Confidence is labelled High with 30+ samples including some since 1990, Low under 5 samples, and Moderate between.
Coverage. 2,959 of 3,142 counties have at least one sample, 2,568 have 5+, and 1,720 have 30+. USGS sampled where it was studying something, not on a grid, so some counties rest on a single project.
A county median is not your well. It describes the wells USGS happened to sample, often decades ago and sometimes from a different aquifer than yours. Hardness is an aesthetic and scale issue rather than a health hazard, but test your own well before buying equipment. More on how the site’s tools work is on the methodology page.
Download, cite or embed the data
The full county table — 2,959 counties with samples, wells, median, quartiles, years and percentile — is free to download and reuse under CC BY 4.0: credit Well Water Fixes with a link to this page. The underlying USGS data is in the public domain.
Cite this data
Well Water Fixes (2026). Well water hardness by US county, compiled from USGS groundwater samples via the Water Quality Portal. https://www.wellwaterfixes.com/water-hardness-by-zip-code
Writing about a particular county? Look it up above and open “Embed this county’s figure” under the result for a small copy-and-paste badge that links back to the data.
Frequently asked questions
- How do I find the water hardness in my area?
- On a private well, enter your zip code above for your county's typical groundwater hardness, then confirm it with a home test kit or a lab test, because wells in the same county can differ a lot. On city water, your utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report lists hardness, or you can call the utility.
- Is 17 gpg hard water?
- Yes — very hard. 17 grains per gallon is about 291 mg/L, well above the 10.5 gpg (180 mg/L) line where the USGS scale starts "very hard". Scale builds quickly at that level and a softener normally pays for itself.
- Which state has the worst hard water?
- In USGS well samples, South Dakota has the hardest groundwater by state median (29.2 gpg), followed by Iowa (21.6 gpg). Individual counties in Oklahoma, Texas and Colorado are harder still. The state table above ranks all of them.
- Is 425 ppm considered hard?
- Yes, very hard. 425 ppm (the same as mg/L) is 24.9 grains per gallon, more than double the 180 mg/L threshold for very hard water. It is very hard on the USGS scale, and common for wells in much of the Midwest and Great Plains.
- Who has the hardest water in Texas?
- Among Texas counties with at least 10 well samples, Stonewall County has the highest median, 105.3 gpg (1,800 mg/L). The Texas state median is 12.7 gpg.
- Is hard well water safe to drink?
- Hardness itself is not a health concern — the EPA has no drinking water limit for it, and calcium and magnesium are ordinary dietary minerals. Its costs are scale, soap use and appliance life. A well still needs testing for bacteria and nitrate, which hardness tells you nothing about.